{"id":76,"date":"2025-02-28T12:07:43","date_gmt":"2025-02-28T12:07:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sebstack.com\/?page_id=76"},"modified":"2025-08-07T12:24:20","modified_gmt":"2025-08-07T12:24:20","slug":"my-writings-about-science","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sebstack.com\/index.php\/my-writings-about-science\/","title":{"rendered":"Various writings about science."},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Reclaiming Lost Science: How to Explain a Forgotten Theory Without the Language to Describe It<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

One of the biggest challenges in reviving forgotten scientific ideas is that the language to describe them has been lost<\/strong>. Over time, key concepts have been redefined, discarded, or ridiculed<\/strong>, making it almost impossible to have a productive discussion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I recently came across the work of Eric Dollard<\/strong>, an old-school electrician who challenged conventional views on electricity and physics<\/strong>. At first, his ideas seemed at odds with modern science, but as I dug deeper into Maxwell, Faraday, Lodge, and other early researchers<\/strong>, I realized something crucial:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We\u2019ve lost not just the theories but the very words and frameworks that those scientists used to describe electrical phenomena<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This loss is more than just historical\u2014it affects the foundations of today\u2019s mainstream physics<\/strong>. Many modern theories, including those in quantum mechanics and electromagnetism<\/strong>, rely on ideas that the great pioneers of electricity\u2014Maxwell, Faraday, and even Euler\u2014found repugnant<\/strong>, such as action at a distance<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even the phrase “action at a distance”<\/strong> itself has been stripped of its original meaning. Once a deeply philosophical and scientific concern, it is now dismissed as \u201cspooky\u201d<\/strong> without serious consideration of its implications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Lost Sensory Experience of Electricity<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

While modern physics teaches an abstract, equation-heavy understanding of electricity, seasoned electricians and engineers<\/strong> that I talk to often “resonate” with some physical interactions that don’t fit neatly into the standard model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, I\u2019ve spoken with experienced electricians who have said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  • “Hang on\u2026 yeah, I can actually feel a kind of mechanical \u2018pull\u2019 when I connect a battery terminal.”<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • “I\u2019ve always wondered exactly where the spark comes from and how it originates.”<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

    These are empirical experiences<\/strong>\u2014they can be felt, observed, and even measured. And yet, the more old-fashioned attempts to explain these effects\u2014ones that align closely with Maxwell\u2019s original thinking<\/strong> or Oliver Lodge\u2019s metaphorical descriptions of their origins<\/strong>\u2014are often dismissed, not because they lack validity, but simply because modern scientific language no longer accommodates them<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    This raises a critical question:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    How do you explain something that doesn\u2019t fit within the current vocabulary<\/strong> of science?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Reclaiming Lost Science: How to Explain a Forgotten Theory Without the Language to Describe It One of the biggest challenges in reviving forgotten scientific ideas is that the language to describe them has been lost. Over time, key concepts have been redefined, discarded, or ridiculed, making it almost impossible to have a productive discussion. I […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-76","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sebstack.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/76","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sebstack.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sebstack.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sebstack.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sebstack.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/sebstack.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/76\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":353,"href":"https:\/\/sebstack.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/76\/revisions\/353"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sebstack.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}